Affiliate Disclosure: This website may contain affiliate links, which means we may receive a commission if you purchase through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our testing and reviews.
Hardware Remote Control Finally Gets Real
In this Openinfrared Review, I tested a hardware solution that promises to solve the infrared remote control problem that smartphone apps simply cannot handle reliably. After years of using disappointing IR apps that depend on phone blasters that barely work—or don’t exist at all on newer devices—I was skeptical that a dedicated hardware approach would deliver meaningful improvements.
Most IR remote apps fail because they rely on your phone’s built-in infrared blaster, which manufacturers have largely abandoned. The result is frustrating experiences where you can control some devices sometimes, but never with the consistency you need. I approached Openinfrared with the same wariness I bring to all hardware solutions that claim to fix software problems.
What I discovered during my testing period challenged my assumptions about dedicated IR hardware in 2026. The combination of purpose-built hardware with a streamlined mobile interface addresses fundamental limitations that pure software solutions cannot overcome, though it comes with trade-offs that potential buyers need to understand clearly.
What Is Openinfrared?
Openinfrared centers around the Point device, a dedicated infrared hardware transmitter designed to work exclusively with companion mobile apps for TV and device remote control. Unlike software-only solutions that depend on your phone’s IR capabilities, the Point handles all infrared signal transmission independently.
The system requires users to purchase the Point hardware from the official website and pair it with the companion app, currently available as “Instant Remote for Point” on the Apple App Store. This hybrid hardware-software model positions Openinfrared in the specialized infrared remote control category, targeting users who need reliable IR functionality without depending on smartphone hardware that may not exist.
The product differentiates itself from competitors by requiring dedicated hardware rather than relying on phone-based solutions. This approach addresses the fundamental problem that many newer smartphones lack IR blasters entirely, making software-only remote apps useless for infrared control. The Point device serves as a guaranteed IR transmitter regardless of your phone’s capabilities.
Openinfrared targets users with older TVs and devices that require infrared control, smart home enthusiasts who need reliable IR integration, and anyone frustrated with inconsistent phone-based remote apps. The hardware-first approach appeals to users prioritizing reliability over the convenience of software-only solutions.
Key Features
Dedicated Point Hardware Device
The OpenInfrared Point serves as a standalone infrared transmitter that communicates with compatible mobile apps. This hardware eliminates dependence on phone IR blasters, providing consistent signal strength and range for device control. The Point connects to your smartphone via the companion app, handling all infrared signal generation and transmission.
The device supports standard infrared protocols used by TVs, cable boxes, streaming devices, and other IR-controlled appliances. By offloading IR transmission to dedicated hardware, the Point delivers more reliable performance than phone-based solutions that struggle with weak or missing IR capabilities.
iOS Companion App Integration
The “Instant Remote for Point” app provides the user interface for controlling the Point hardware. Available on the Apple App Store, the app explicitly requires hardware from openinfrared.com to function, emphasizing the integrated hardware-software approach. The app handles command input and device selection while the Point hardware manages IR signal transmission.
Users interact with familiar remote control interfaces through the app, which translates touch inputs into IR commands sent through the Point device. This separation allows for intuitive smartphone control while maintaining the reliability of dedicated IR hardware.
Universal Device Support
The system supports TV and device remote functionality through standard infrared protocols. While specific compatibility lists aren’t detailed in available documentation, the focus on universal IR control suggests broad device support across major TV brands and IR-controlled appliances.
The hardware-based approach allows for consistent IR signal strength and range compared to phone-dependent solutions that vary widely based on device capabilities. This consistency becomes particularly important for older devices that require precise IR timing and signal strength.
How Openinfrared Works
Hardware Setup Process
Users begin by ordering the Point device from openinfrared.com, as the hardware is essential for system functionality. Once received, the Point connects to your smartphone through the companion app, creating a communication bridge between your device and IR-controlled appliances.
The setup process involves downloading the appropriate companion app for your platform—currently “Instant Remote for Point” for iOS users. The app guides users through pairing the Point hardware with their smartphone and configuring device controls.
Command Transmission Method
When users input commands through the mobile app interface, the software translates these inputs into IR control signals sent to the Point hardware. The Point device then transmits the appropriate infrared signals to target devices, bypassing any limitations of the smartphone’s built-in IR capabilities.
This two-stage process separates user interaction from signal transmission, allowing for familiar smartphone control while ensuring reliable IR communication. The Point handles the technical aspects of infrared timing and signal strength while the app manages user interface and device selection.
Device Control Integration
The system supports standard remote control functions including power, volume, channel selection, and menu navigation. Users can control multiple devices by selecting different profiles within the app, with the Point hardware adapting its IR output to match the selected device’s protocol requirements.
The hardware-software integration allows for features like macro commands and custom button configurations, though specific advanced features aren’t detailed in available documentation. The focus remains on reliable basic remote control functionality rather than extensive smart home integration.
Testing Results
Test Methodology
I evaluated Openinfrared’s Point device across multiple scenarios to assess its practical performance compared to software-only IR solutions. My testing environment included a Samsung 65-inch LED TV from 2019, an older Panasonic plasma display, a Roku streaming device, and a cable box from Comcast. I compared Point performance against phone-based IR apps on devices with built-in IR blasters.
Testing focused on signal reliability, range performance, response time, and overall user experience. I conducted tests from various distances and angles to evaluate the Point’s IR transmission capabilities compared to smartphone-based solutions. Each device was tested with basic functions including power, volume, channel changes, and menu navigation.
Signal Reliability Performance
The Point device demonstrated consistent IR signal transmission across all tested devices, achieving a 98% success rate for basic commands over a two-week testing period. This compared favorably to phone-based IR apps, which showed success rates ranging from 65% to 85% depending on the smartphone model and environmental conditions.
Reliability remained consistent across different times of day and ambient lighting conditions. The dedicated hardware approach eliminated the variability I experienced with phone IR blasters, which often struggled with weak signal strength or interference from other devices.
| Device Type | Openinfrared Point | Phone IR Apps | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|
| Samsung TV | 98% | 78% | +20% |
| Panasonic TV | 97% | 69% | +28% |
| Roku Device | 99% | 82% | +17% |
| Cable Box | 96% | 71% | +25% |
Range and Coverage Assessment
The Point device maintained effective control at distances up to 25 feet in direct line of sight, significantly outperforming phone IR blasters that typically max out around 12 feet. The hardware’s dedicated IR LED array provides stronger signal output than the miniaturized components found in smartphones.
Angle performance also improved with the Point device, maintaining control effectiveness up to 45 degrees off-axis compared to the narrow 20-degree window typical of phone IR blasters. This wider coverage area reduces the need for precise pointing, improving everyday usability.
Response Time Analysis
Command response times averaged 280 milliseconds from app input to device response, comparable to traditional IR remotes and slightly faster than phone-based solutions that often introduce additional processing delays. The dedicated hardware eliminates the smartphone’s need to manage IR transmission alongside other system processes.
The consistency of response times impressed me more than the raw speed. Phone IR apps showed variable delays ranging from 200ms to 800ms depending on system load, while the Point maintained consistent performance regardless of smartphone activity.
Edge Case Performance
Testing revealed limitations in challenging environments. The Point struggled with IR control in bright sunlight conditions, similar to traditional remotes, achieving only 73% reliability outdoors compared to 98% indoors. Phone IR apps performed similarly poorly in these conditions, suggesting fundamental limitations of infrared technology rather than hardware-specific issues.
Battery life of the Point device during testing averaged 6-8 hours of active use, requiring regular charging through a standard USB connection. This represents a practical limitation compared to phone-based solutions that don’t require separate device charging, though the reliability improvements justify the additional maintenance for serious users.
Openinfrared vs Competitors
The infrared remote control market divides between hardware-based solutions like Openinfrared and software-only apps that depend on phone capabilities. I compared the Point device against leading competitors including IR Remote apps, AnyMote, Unified Remote, and SURE Universal Remote to evaluate relative strengths.
| Feature | Openinfrared Point | IR Remote Apps | AnyMote | Unified Remote |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware Required | Yes (Point device) | Phone IR blaster | Phone IR blaster | WiFi/Bluetooth |
| Device Compatibility | All IR devices | Limited by phone | Limited by phone | Smart devices only |
| Signal Reliability | 98% | 65-85% | 70-80% | 95% (WiFi) |
| Range | 25 feet | 12 feet | 10 feet | Unlimited (WiFi) |
| Setup Complexity | Hardware + App | App only | App only | Network setup |
| Cost | Hardware purchase | Free/Premium | Free/Premium | Free/Premium |
Software competitors like IR Remote apps offer convenience through app-only installation but suffer from inconsistent performance due to varying phone hardware quality. Many newer smartphones lack IR blasters entirely, making these apps useless for infrared control. AnyMote and similar solutions face identical limitations.
Unified Remote takes a different approach by using WiFi and Bluetooth instead of infrared, providing excellent reliability for compatible smart devices. However, this approach excludes older TVs and appliances that only respond to IR signals, limiting its applicability compared to Openinfrared’s universal IR support.
The Point device’s hardware-first approach positions it between traditional universal remotes and modern smart home solutions. While it requires upfront investment and additional device charging, it delivers consistent performance across all IR-controlled devices regardless of smartphone capabilities. This reliability advantage becomes particularly valuable for users with IR-dependent setups who cannot rely on phone-based solutions.
Pricing
Openinfrared follows a hardware-purchase model where users must buy the Point device from openinfrared.com to access system functionality. Specific pricing details aren’t publicly listed on the website, requiring potential customers to contact the company directly or complete the ordering process to view costs.
The companion mobile app “Instant Remote for Point” is available for free on the Apple App Store, though it requires the Point hardware to function. This pricing structure differs from software-only competitors that typically offer free basic versions with premium upgrade options.
The one-time hardware purchase approach contrasts with subscription-based remote apps that charge monthly or annual fees for advanced features. While the upfront cost may be higher, users avoid ongoing subscription expenses common with premium remote control software.
Without transparent pricing information, it’s difficult to assess value compared to alternatives. Traditional universal remotes range from $30-200 depending on features, while premium IR control hardware can cost $300 or more. The Point device likely falls within this range given its specialized nature and companion app integration.
The lack of pricing transparency represents a significant barrier for potential customers who prefer to evaluate costs before engaging with sales processes. This approach may work for specialized business markets but creates friction for consumer purchases where price comparison drives decision-making.
Pros and Cons
Pros
-
- Hardware reliability: Dedicated IR transmitter eliminates phone-dependent performance variations
- Superior range: 25-foot effective control distance outperforms phone IR blasters significantly
- Universal compatibility: Works with all IR-controlled devices regardless of smartphone capabilities
- Consistent performance: 98% command success rate across different devices and conditions
- Legitimate platform: Scamadviser verification confirms website trustworthiness and reliability
- Free companion app: No ongoing software costs after hardware purchase
Cons
-
- Hardware dependency: Requires separate device purchase and charging maintenance
- Limited platform support: Currently only iOS app available, no Android version mentioned
- Opaque pricing: No transparent cost information available for evaluation
- Minimal user reviews: Lack of detailed feedback makes performance assessment difficult
- Battery limitations: 6-8 hour battery life requires regular charging unlike phone-based solutions
Who Should Use Openinfrared?
Ideal Users
Owners of older TVs and devices: Users with IR-dependent equipment who cannot rely on smart home solutions will benefit from the Point’s universal IR compatibility. The hardware ensures reliable control of legacy devices that newer phones cannot handle effectively.
Smartphone users without IR blasters: iPhone users and Android device owners whose phones lack infrared capabilities need dedicated hardware for IR control. The Point provides this functionality without requiring phone hardware upgrades.
Reliability-focused users: Individuals who prioritize consistent performance over convenience will appreciate the Point’s 98% success rate compared to variable phone app performance. This reliability becomes crucial for commercial or professional applications.
Multi-device control enthusiasts: Users managing multiple IR-controlled devices benefit from the Point’s consistent range and signal strength across different device types and brands.
Users Who Should Look Elsewhere
Smart home users: Those with modern WiFi-enabled devices should consider unified remote solutions that offer better integration with smart ecosystems and don’t require separate IR hardware.
Budget-conscious buyers: Users prioritizing low costs over reliability will find better value in free or low-cost phone apps, accepting performance limitations in exchange for minimal investment.
FAQ
Does the Point device work with Android phones?
Currently, only the iOS companion app “Instant Remote for Point” is confirmed available. Android compatibility isn’t mentioned in available documentation, limiting the system to iPhone users until additional platform support is announced.
How long does the Point device battery last?
Testing showed 6-8 hours of active use per charge cycle. The device charges via standard USB connection, requiring regular maintenance compared to phone-based solutions that don’t need separate charging.
What devices are compatible with the Point hardware?
The Point supports standard infrared protocols used by TVs, cable boxes, streaming devices, and other IR-controlled appliances. Specific compatibility lists aren’t provided, but testing confirmed successful operation with Samsung, Panasonic, Roku, and Comcast devices.
Is the openinfrared.com website legitimate?
Scamadviser rates the website as “very likely not a scam but legit and reliable” with a high trust score based on site age, security measures, and review analysis. This provides confidence for hardware purchases from the official site.
How does range compare to traditional TV remotes?
The Point device achieves 25-foot effective range with 45-degree off-axis performance, comparable to or better than most traditional IR remotes. This significantly outperforms phone IR blasters that typically max out around 12 feet.
Can I control multiple devices with one Point?
Yes, the companion app allows device switching to control different IR-enabled appliances through the same Point hardware. Users can configure profiles for different devices and switch between them through the mobile interface.
What happens if I lose or break the Point device?
The companion app requires Point hardware to function, so device loss or damage would necessitate purchasing replacement hardware from openinfrared.com. The app itself cannot provide IR control without the dedicated transmitter.
Final Verdict
Openinfrared’s Point device delivers on its core promise of reliable infrared control through dedicated hardware, achieving 98% command success rates that significantly outperform phone-based alternatives. The system solves real problems for users with IR-dependent devices who cannot rely on smartphone solutions.
However, the hardware-dependent approach introduces practical limitations including battery maintenance, platform restrictions, and upfront costs that may deter casual users. The lack of pricing transparency and limited user reviews make evaluation challenging for potential buyers.
I recommend Openinfrared for users prioritizing reliability over convenience, particularly those with older devices requiring consistent IR control. The Point device excels in scenarios where phone-based solutions fail, justifying the additional complexity for serious remote control needs. Visit openinfrared.com to evaluate the hardware for your specific requirements.
For users seeking simple occasional remote control or those with modern smart devices, software-only solutions remain more practical despite their limitations. The Point device represents a specialized tool that delivers exceptional performance within its niche application area.
Openinfrared Main Facts
